I am not prude, but I would argue the image in this Twitter ad was inappropriate:
No, what popped up on my timeline did not include the blurring.
It’s a beautiful painting, but they could have chosen plenty of other famous pieces of artwork. There was only one reason they chose this one.
And, yes, it worked. It quickly drew my eyes to the advertisement. Being effective does not make it okay.
Am I wrong and I am a prude?
Final thing to consider: If an alcoholic was “on the wagon,” would you sneak liquor into punch he/she was drinking?
I don’t think some folks realize just how pornography is for some men (and probably a higher percentage of teenage boys).